Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-03-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.88 x 2.91 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 554 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than LG G5, having a general score of 90.7 against 76.1. Even though the Galaxy A52 is notably newer than the LG G5, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG G5, because it has 4 more 2200 MHz cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG G5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than LG G5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G5, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better battery life than LG G5, because it has a 61% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.