Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than LG G8 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 84.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction has the same thickness than the LG G8 ThinQ, but it's somewhat heavier. The LG G8 ThinQ has a better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A52, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or video in low light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Galaxy A52 features longer battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.