Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than LG G8S ThinQ's score of 82.5. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is newer than LG G8S ThinQ's, but it is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The LG G8S ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248px. The LG G8S ThinQ has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A52 captures much clearer videos and photos than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features longer battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.