Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, getting a score of 90.7 against 82.7. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than LG G8X ThinQ, but both of them have the same thickness. The LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A52. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52 features just a bit better battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.