Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| -- | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the LG K92, with a 90.7 score against 85.4. Galaxy A52 is a just a little lighter phone than LG K92, but both of them have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a bit better display density.
LG K92 features more storage for applications and games than Galaxy A52, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K92 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better performance than LG K92. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A52 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger back camera sensor. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.