Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG V10's 78.6 global score. Galaxy A52 is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG V10. Galaxy A52 counts with a better processing power than LG V10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
LG V10 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A52 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than LG V10, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.