Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. The Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's just a bit thicker and heavier. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 has superior battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.