Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the LG Velvet's 87.1 global score. Although the Galaxy A52 is newer than the LG Velvet, it's just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. LG Velvet has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little bigger display.
LG Velvet counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A52 has just a bit longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.