Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A52's global score of 90.7. Even being the best in our current comparison, the LG Wing is a way thicker and notably heavier phone than the Galaxy A52. The LG Wing features a little faster processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 and LG Wing both feature incredibly similar displays, because although the LG Wing has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit bigger display. LG Wing features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A52, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. LG Wing features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a 64 MP, a 0.59 inches sensor and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Wing also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.