Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Motorola edge, with a overall score of 90.7 against 89.6. Galaxy A52 is a newer and thinner phone than the Motorola edge, but it is a little bit heavier. Motorola edge has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A52. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola edge's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A52, both have the same camera aperture, the same video frame rates, the same back camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera. Motorola edge has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola edge's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.