Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 40's 77.2 global score. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, we must tell that it's also a way older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. The Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both have a same size screen, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality and a much smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A52 has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.