Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a 90.7 score against 77. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy A52 design is extremely older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a better screen than Galaxy A52. They have a greater pixel count in each screen inch, a display of the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy A52 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photos, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.