Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is slightly better than the Moto G 5G Plus, with a score of 90.7 against 82.6. Galaxy A52 is a just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Moto G 5G Plus, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a processing unit that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A52 one, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Moto G 5G Plus has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 one, although the Moto G 5G Plus also has a bit better number of pixels per screen inch, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a slightly better camera than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger sensor and a lot more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.