Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic Emerald |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s global score of 82.1. Samsung Galaxy A52's construction is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although they were released with only 3 months difference. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a little higher display pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021)'s storage for games and applications is very similar to Galaxy A52's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52 features a superior camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with way more mega pixels. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.