Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than the Moto Z3, getting a global score of 90.7 against 77.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than the Moto Z3, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A52 and the Motorola Moto Z3 have extremely similar screens, although the Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller display.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.