Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola One Action, having a 90.7 score against 78.5. Although the Galaxy A52 is a bit heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Action counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy A52 features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Action, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features improved battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.