Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Motorola One Vision, having a global score of 90.7 against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Motorola One Vision, although it is also a bit heavier. The Motorola One Vision features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a quite better pixels amount per inch of display.
Galaxy A52 features a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 has improved battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% more battery capacity. Galaxy A52 features a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.