Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| -- | Polar night |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, getting a 90.7 score against 80.5. The Galaxy A52 is a just a little thinner and lighter cellphone than Nokia 8.3 5G, even though they were only released with a couple of months difference. Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a little sharper screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a quite better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly bigger memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Nokia 8.3 5G has a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.