Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having a overall score of 90.7 against 80.3. Although the Galaxy A52 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy A52 is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's processor is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A52's processor, they have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a little sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a quite greater pixels density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has more storage capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.