Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Nokia 9 PureView's global score of 76.4. Even though Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than the Nokia 9 PureView, it is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker. Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 counts with superior battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.