Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Nokia X100's global score of 77.3. The Galaxy A52 design is a bit thinner and lighter than Nokia X100, although both were released only 8 months apart. The Galaxy A52 has a little sharper display than Nokia X100, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a little greater pixels number in each inch of screen.
The Nokia X100 has as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Galaxy A52, both of them have equal internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has a bit better processing power than Nokia X100. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 has a lot better camera than Nokia X100, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP. Galaxy A52 and Nokia X100 have really similar batteries performance, although the Nokia X100 has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.