Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| -- | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 overall score. Even though Galaxy A52 and the Nokia XR20 were only released 4 months apart, Galaxy A52 is extremely thinner and much lighter. The Nokia XR20 has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20. Both have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a superior camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 also has a way larger sensor, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a way better video quality. The Nokia XR20 counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.