Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a global score of 90.7 against 75.8. The Galaxy A52 is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy A52, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit lower display density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A52 features just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more MP back camera, better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.