Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 global score. The Galaxy A52 is a thinner and lighter device than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity per inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy A52 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a battery duration that is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one. The nubia Red Magic 5S takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, a 0.59 inches sensor and a camera with a 64 MP, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.