Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than OPPO Find X2, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 79.7. The Galaxy A52 construction is newer, but a little heavier and just a bit thicker than the OPPO Find X2. OPPO Find X2 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a greater pixels density and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features more storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.