Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A52's body is newer, a bit thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A52, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little bit bigger display and a better screen pixels density. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is very similar to the Galaxy A52 one, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way lower 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.