Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, having a score of 90.7 against 77. Although the Galaxy A52 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A20s, it is a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way higher display pixels density and a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A20s, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 13% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much larger back camera sensor and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.