Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having a global score of 90.7 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it is a little bit lighter. Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A52, although it has a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a way better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52's one, both of them have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and equal internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. Galaxy A52 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.