Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Galaxy A30, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 79.6. The Galaxy A52 is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy A30, but it's just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A52 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a just a bit better pixels quantity in each screen inch, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A30, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.