Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A30s's overall score of 79.8. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A30s, although it is a little thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger display.
Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Galaxy A52 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.