Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A31, having a general score of 90.7 against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A31's, but it is also a little heavier. Galaxy A31 features a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy A52, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy A31 has a little better battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.