Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than Galaxy A6, with a overall score of 90.7 against 75.8. Galaxy A52's design is much newer than Galaxy A6's, but it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A52 has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a higher pixels density and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a greater camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A52 features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.