Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Galaxy A52's body is newer than Galaxy A70's, but it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Galaxy A52 has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A52 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A70's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A52.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.