Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, getting a general score of 90.7 against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy A52's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, but it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a processor that's just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A52, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has less cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Galaxy Note 3 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little bit smaller display and a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations, a much higher resolution back camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 41 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.