Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's 80.4 general score. Although the Galaxy A52 is way newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy A52 one, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A52 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.