Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Note3's global score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note3, but they have the same thickness. The Galaxy A52 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit better screen density and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores (although they are slower). Galaxy A52 has a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a way more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A52 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.