Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 global score. Galaxy A52's body is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A52 shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.