Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a bit better than the Galaxy S10e, with a overall score of 90.7 against 86.3. Even though the Galaxy A52 is much newer than the Galaxy S10e, it is much heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A52. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A52 has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.