Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Galaxy A52, with a overall score of 93.4 against 90.7. The Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy A52. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot higher video definition and a larger sensor.
Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features improved battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.