Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S8's general score of 81.7. Galaxy A52 is a incredibly newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S8, although it's heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy S8's CPU is just as good as Galaxy A52's processor, and although the Galaxy S8 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.