Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2021-03-17 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than the Galaxy S8 Active, having a score of 90.7 against 81.9. The Galaxy A52 is a extremely newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy S8 Active. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Galaxy A52 one, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy A52 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.