Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it is also incredibly thinner and a lot lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A52 features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy A52 count with quite similar batteries performance. Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality photos and a camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.