Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. The Galaxy A52 construction is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. Galaxy XCover Pro's processor is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy A52, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.