Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a global score of 90.7 against 88.5. The Galaxy A52 design is newer, but thicker and a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because it has a quite higher screen pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A52 features a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.