Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52, getting a 92.3 score against 90.7. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A52 were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a little bit lighter and thinner. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a quite larger display. The Galaxy A52 counts with a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.