Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2023-05-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.80 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Black, Khaki Green and Platinum Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.74 inches (1/1.35") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than the Xperia 1 V, with a 90.7 score against 82.7. Galaxy A52's construction has the same thickness than Xperia 1 V, but it is just a little heavier. The Galaxy A52 has a much faster processor than Xperia 1 V, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Sony Xperia 1 V features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Sony Xperia 1 V also has a way greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1644 x 3840 resolution. Xperia 1 V features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less MP, a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy A52 counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia 1 V, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xperia 1 V has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.