Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a 90.7 score against 79. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's noticeably thinner and also incredibly newer. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a quite greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52 features a superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments and a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.