Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, getting a general score of 90.7 against 90. The Galaxy A52 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, even when both were released with only 6 months difference. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also counts with a little larger screen. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A52, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.