Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 88.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-02-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| -- | Horizon blue and Midnight gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 11, having a overall score of 90.7 against 88.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 and Xiaomi Mi 11 were released only 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is a little bit thicker but also just a bit lighter. Xiaomi Mi 11 features a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 11 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11 features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A52, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Galaxy A52 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 11, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a way higher video definition and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has a 2 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.