Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with a score of 90.7 against 81.4. Galaxy A52 is a newer phone than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, but it is thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A52. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.